Until Death Do Us Part?

June 17, 2011 at 7:09 am | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why is it that a man or woman must take just one partner until death parts them? Oh, I know that many religions say so, and we have been ruled by religion for a long time. But I am not saying that couples shouldn’t stick together. Indeed, for some people, it works very well. However, observation and my own experience lead me to wonder whether we are naturally programmed to mate for life.

People’s needs change as they move through different stages of their lives. Children need to be cared for and nurtured. Adolescents need to experiment, to push the boundaries, taste the world and learn its limitations. Young adults need action, romance and sex. Parents need to develop their work and life skills, to nurture their offspring, and to have sex when they aren’t too tired. Middle-aged and older adults need support, and to see their genetic line continue– and sex, and to set up some security for retirement. Old folks need security, companionship and relaxation.

Can one person provide all of these needs to one partner right throughout life? Yes, there are some who can, as we sometimes see in happy, long-lasting marriages. But there are also many marriages that have been long-lasting only because either partner, or both, cannot leave. The reason could be religious, cultural, emotional, fear of the unknown, lack of the means to support oneself, or any other reason that prevents escape.

We all know that people change as they get older and gain more experience of life; that is, if they actually learn from their experience. But people change at different rates and for different reasons.

Once a couple has moved into another phase of life, they may find that what originally kept them together is no longer there. They may find someone else who will provide what the original partner can no longer provide. In the past, this has caused much heartache, and much emotional harm, because the original couple was expected to remain together, to “make the best of it”.

Many people say a couple should remain together for their children’s sake. If the couple have a mature relationship, then I would encourage that. We often see people break up when their children are grown. But if either feels trapped, or is in need of something the other cannot provide, then the marriage can become loveless, perhaps bitter or abusive. These relationships are destructive; not only for them, but also for the children. I have seen many physically and emotionally damaged children of couples who stayed together “for the children’s sake”.

I have also seen committed relationships that last only as long as the partners see them to be positive; that may be ten, twenty, thirty years. Then, once one or other realises that a big hole has developed that they cannot fill, they move on and find the one with whom they can fill it.

The partner who makes children with you in the heat of passion may not make a good support person or parent. The one you produce and raise children with may not be the one you want to spend your middle or declining years with. You, or the one with whom you once shared interests, beliefs, and attraction, may have changed completely, so that you no longer have much, or anything in common.

So why not move on? Why should a couple be forced to maintain a  relationship that is quite likely to become destructive to both of them? Why not give each other the chance to become content instead of frustrated; happy instead of embittered; independent instead of dependent?

The laws in Western nations today allow relationships to be terminated. The extent to which people take up that freedom demonstrates something important. If we were meant to mate for life, then why do such a huge percentage of relationships break up?

Why don’t we accept that marriage for life is an ideal; that it is often not realistic? Why don’t we get the most out of a relationship, without abusing it, and once it is no longer something of value, leave it. As long as we acknowledge and respect each other’s rights and responsibilities from past relationships, we are surely making happier people and a happier society.

© Linda Visman 17th June 2011

Fiction or Non-fiction?

June 8, 2011 at 1:51 am | Posted in Reading, Writing and Life | Leave a comment

How I answer that question depends from which perspective I am looking at it. If I take it from being a reader, then my answer will be ‘mostly fiction’. I like to read for relaxation most of the time, and a fast-paced crime thriller does it for me, if it is well written.

However, I do like to read non-fiction as well. It is usually memoir or auto/biography, because I am interested in people. Not in celebrities – no, I am not a celebrity lover at all, and have no time for them. I like stories of ordinary people living ordinary, or not-so-ordinary lives, or whose tales bring to life another time and place. Sometimes, I need to do research for my own writing, which gives me another reason to read non-fiction.  And I like to read a certain number of blogs too.

I write short stories and novels, but I also write memoir and biography. So, if I look at the question from the perspective of a writer, I will say, ‘both fiction and non-fiction’. Both types of writing have a place, though they often overlap (I’m thinking of some of those celebrity bios out there). When I was younger, fiction predominated in the marketplace. However, nowadays, I see that there are a great many non-fiction books out there. It is even easier these days to get a non-fiction book, article, etc published than it is to get fiction published.

So, overall, it is not ‘fiction OR non-fiction’, it is ‘both of them’.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.


Our species is evolving. But will we ever be smarter than crows?

Helen Armstrong - writing on the move

I write when I travel but not always about travelling. It doesn't have to be a quiet corner...

Rosella Room

Socio-cultural comment on a range of issues, including literature, music and mental health


Exploring the Past to Improve the Future

Foxgloves and Bumblebees

A Nature Journal

L.T. Garvin

Eclectic blog: short fiction, poetry, humor, occasional dreams and wild book schemes.

Echidna Tracks

Australian Haiku


art. popular since 10,000 BC

Word Craft ~ Prose and Poetry

Colleen M. Chesebro ~ Novelist, Prose Metrist, & Word Witch


Thel's Sketchings: Art, Photography, Musings & Short Stories

Learn Fun Facts

An Archive of Curious Facts for the Curious


A blog about writing and reading


Life in a flash - a weekly writing blog

Half Baked In Paradise

Searching, settling, sauteeing and spritzing

The Curry Apple Orchard

A blog designed to remember the past and celebrate the present.


A site for the Barsetshire Diaries Books and others

Cee's Photo Challenges

Teaching the art of composition for photography.